Input and output modality effects in immediate serial recall

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Harvey, A. J. and Beaman, C. P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5124-242X (2007) Input and output modality effects in immediate serial recall. Memory, 15 (7). pp. 693-700. ISSN 0965-8211 doi: 10.1080/09658210701644677

Abstract/Summary

In immediate recall tasks, visual recency is substantially enhanced when output interference is low (Cowan, Saults, Elliott, & Moreno, 2002; Craik, 1969) whereas auditory recency remains high even under conditions of high output interference. Ibis auditory advantage has been interpreted in terms of auditory resistance to output interference (e.g., Neath & Surprenant, 2003). In this study the auditory-visual difference at low output interference re-emerged when ceiling effects were accounted for, but only with spoken output. With written responding the auditory advantage remained significantly larger with high than with low output interference. These new data suggest that both superior auditory encoding and modality-specific output interference contribute to the classic auditory-visual modality effect.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/14026
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/09658210701644677
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences
Uncontrolled Keywords SHORT-TERM-MEMORY, RECENCY, STORAGE, ORDER
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar