False recognition of abstract versus common objects in older and younger adults: testing the semantic categorization account

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Koutstaal, W., Reddy, C., Jackson, E. M., Prince, S., Cendan, D. L. and Schacter, D. L. (2003) False recognition of abstract versus common objects in older and younger adults: testing the semantic categorization account. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 29 (4). pp. 499-510. ISSN 0278-7393 doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.499

Abstract/Summary

Older adults often demonstrate higher levels of false recognition than do younger adults. However, in experiments using novel shapes without preexisting semantic representations, this age-related elevation in false recognition was found to be greatly attenuated. Two experiments tested a semantic categorization account of these findings, examining whether older adults show especially heightened false recognition if the stimuli have preexisting semantic representations, such that semantic category information attenuates or truncates the encoding or retrieval of item-specific perceptual information. In Experiment 1, ambiguous shapes were presented with or without disambiguating semantic labels. Older adults showed higher false recognition when labels were present but not when labels were never presented. In Experiment 2, older adults showed higher false recognition for concrete but not abstract objects. The semantic categorization account was supported.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/13969
Identification Number/DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.499
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences
Uncontrolled Keywords AGE-DIFFERENCES, PICTURE MEMORY, SUPERIORITY, CONFIDENCE, RETRIEVAL, ACCURACY, RECALL, DETAIL, WORDS
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar