Effects of active information processing on the understanding of risk information

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Natter, H. and Berry, D.C. (2005) Effects of active information processing on the understanding of risk information. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19 (1). pp. 123-135. ISSN 0888-4080 doi: 10.1002/acp.1068

Abstract/Summary

Two experiments investigated effects of active processing of risk information on participants' understanding and judgments. It was hypothesized that more active processing would lead to better understanding and differences in affective judgments (e.g. increased satisfaction and reduced perceived risk to health). In both experiments participants were given a written scenario about their being prescribed a fictitious medication. This medication was said to cause side effects in 2% of people who took it. Before answering a series of written questions, participants in the active conditions of both experiments were asked to carry out a reflective task (portraying the size of risk on a bar chart in Experiment 1 and answering a reflective question in Experiment 2). The results showed that active participants rated the likelihood of experiencing possible side effects significantly lower than passive participants (Experiment 1), and that active participants were significantly more satisfied with the information and judged perceived risk to health from taking the medication significantly lower than passive participants (Experiment 2). In both experiments, active participants were significantly more correct in their probability and frequency estimates. The studies demonstrate that active processing of risk information leads to improved understanding of the information given. This has important implications for risk communication. In the context of health, better understanding should lead to improved decision-making and health outcomes. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/13903
Identification Number/DOI 10.1002/acp.1068
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences
Uncontrolled Keywords COMMUNICATION, DECISIONS, REPRESENTATION, PROBABILITY, PARTNERSHIP, UNCERTAINTY
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar