Do expert drivers have a reduced illusion of superiority?

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Waylen, A. E., Horswill, M. S., Alexander, J. L. and McKenna, F. P. (2004) Do expert drivers have a reduced illusion of superiority? Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7 (4-5). pp. 323-331. ISSN 1369-8478 doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2004.09.009

Abstract/Summary

It is well established that people tend to rate themselves as better than average across many domains. To maintain these illusions, it is suggested that people distort feedback about their own and others' performance. This study examined expert/novice differences in self-ratings when people compared themselves with others of the same level of expertise and background as themselves. Given that a key expert characteristic is increased self-monitoring, we predicted that experts in a domain may have a reduced illusion of superiority because they are more aware of their actual ability. We compared expert police drivers with novice police drivers and found that this prediction was not supported. Expert police drivers rated themselves as superior to equally qualified drivers, to the same degree as novices, Cohen's d = .03 ns. Despite their extensive additional training and experience, experts still appear to be as susceptible to illusions of superiority Lis everyone else. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/13822
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2004.09.009
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences
Uncontrolled Keywords unrealistic optimism, expertise, illusory biases, driving, training, experience, DRIVING SKILL, UNREALISTIC OPTIMISM, JUDGMENTS, ABILITY, RISK, OWN, ASSESSMENTS, UNIQUENESS, ACCIDENT
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar