The graduate teacher programme in England: mentor training, quality assurance and the findings of inspection

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Brookes, W. (2005) The graduate teacher programme in England: mentor training, quality assurance and the findings of inspection. Professional Development in Education (formerly Journal of In-service Education), 31 (1). pp. 43-62. ISSN 1941-5257 doi: 10.1080/13674580500200268

Abstract/Summary

In its recent report on the Graduate Teacher Programme (GTP), an employment-based route to Qualified Teacher Status (QTS) in England, the Government's Office for Standards in Education found that, although almost all trainees meet the standards required to qualify, too often they do so at an adequate level, rather than achieving the high levels of which they should be capable. The underlying reason for this is the quality of mentoring provided in the schools. The inspectors concluded that schoolbased trainers are often not adequately prepared for their role in implementing wide-ranging training programmes for trainee teachers. Despite this generally bleak picture, Ofsted concluded that 'the minority of cases of good practice in the training programmes and of high quality teaching by trainees indicate that the GTP can be an effective alternative route for training teachers'™. This article considers the strengths and weaknesses of the Graduate Teacher Programme, introduced in January 1998, and also reports on a small-scale project, funded by the Teacher Training Agency (TTA), the key objective of which was to strengthen the existing partnerships by improving the quality of school-based tutor training and continuous professional development of staff.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/12499
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/13674580500200268
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > Institute of Education
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar