“Your account has been compromised”: exploring emotional triggers in scam emails

[thumbnail of Proofread_Manuscript_Special issue IP_17Feb25.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Moghaddam, M. M. and Aslan, E. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4174-5493 (2025) “Your account has been compromised”: exploring emotional triggers in scam emails. Internet Pragmatics. ISSN 2542-386X (In Press)

Abstract/Summary

Scam emails are a significant threat to online security, exploiting individuals’ vulnerabilities through emotional manipulation. This study explores emotional triggers in a corpus of scam emails (n = 371) compiled from ten genuine email accounts over a period of five years (2018-2023). Using Robinson’s (2008) taxonomy of basic emotions, the positive and negative emotional content and triggers were identified and analyzed. The findings revealed that an overwhelming majority of the emails alluded to negative emotions (n = 252) suggesting a clear scammer strategy in stimulating negativity to achieve fraudulent objectives. Conversely, the emails that evoked positive emotions (n = 119) seemed to create a false sense of trust, sociability and gratitude. In addition, many scam emails employed various combinations of emotional triggers to manipulate recipients. This study sheds light on the intersection between emotions and discourse pragmatics and highlights the affective dimensions of discourse in email communication.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/121793
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Literature and Languages > English Language and Applied Linguistics
Publisher John Benjamins
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar