Impact of different carbon labels on consumer inference

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of 51 - Edenbrandt et al.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Edenbrandt, A. K., Asioli, D. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2274-8450 and Nordström, J. (2025) Impact of different carbon labels on consumer inference. Journal of Cleaner Production, 494. 1405020. ISSN 0959-6526 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145020

Abstract/Summary

Carbon labelling of food products serves as a demand-side tool with the potential to drive the essential shift in consumption patterns toward reducing climate impact. For carbon labels to influence food choices, they must enable consumers to recognize and adopt purchasing behaviour that lower their climate footprint. While inference plays a critical role in facilitating behavioural change, evidence remains sparse regarding how specific characteristics of carbon labels affect consumers' ability to accurately identify low-carbon products. This study investigates how different carbon labels affect consumers' efficiency in identifying low-carbon-emitting food products. Three labels are evaluated: (i) ‘Digit’ specifies the amount of CO2e-emissions from the production of the product, (ii) ‘Colour-Coded’ label indicates the overall climate impact from A to E, (iii) ‘Logo’ identifies the lowest-emitting products within each product category. Respondents in a survey in the United Kingdom were asked to identify the lowest-emitting food product in a set of tasks. All labels improved accuracy in the tasks when products from the same food category were included. Importantly, in the tasks that included products from different categories, the Digit outperformed both the Colour-Coded and the Logo labels. Notably, the Logo did not improve accuracy compared to no-label tasks. It is important that a carbon label informs about the overall climate impact rather than the within-category performance, should the label help consumers identify changes that contribute to significant reductions in climate impact.

Altmetric Badge

Additional Information Unmapped bibliographic data: DA - 2025/02/12/ [EPrints field already has value set] JO - Journal of Cleaner Production [Field not mapped to EPrints]
Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/120895
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145020
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Uncontrolled Keywords carbon label, climate information, consumer inference, front-of-pack label, sustainability label
Additional Information Unmapped bibliographic data: DA - 2025/02/12/ [EPrints field already has value set] JO - Journal of Cleaner Production [Field not mapped to EPrints]
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar