Exploring enablers of and barriers to a fruit and vegetable voucher scheme in England: insights from the Fresh Street Community feasibility study

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Enablers_barriers_full_paperV3.0 CW.docx]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Pan, J., Relton, C., Howard, L., Garg, P., Puranik, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6427-8414, Thomas, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5699-4508, Bradbeer, J., Sutton, R., Wagstaff, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9400-8641 and Pettinger, C. (2025) Exploring enablers of and barriers to a fruit and vegetable voucher scheme in England: insights from the Fresh Street Community feasibility study. Nutrients, 17 (3). 483. ISSN 2072-6643 doi: 10.3390/nu17030483

Abstract/Summary

Background/Objectives: Many deprived communities in the UK have low fruit and vegetable (FV) intake, leading to poor health outcomes. Fresh Street is a place-based voucher approach that enables households to buy FV from local independent suppliers. Fresh Street Community embeds this approach within community hubs, thus enabling households to use vouchers to purchase FV from community centres. This paper explores the enablers and barriers influencing the uptake of Fresh Street Community in two UK urban areas of high deprivation. Methods: This three-phase exploratory qualitative study was informed by ‘co-production’ with community researchers at both sites: (1) literature review and observations identifying enablers and barriers in FV voucher schemes; (2) semi-structured interviews and focus groups with the research team and community food researchers to ‘validate’ the factors identified in phase 1 and to develop explanatory narratives for these factors; and (3) participatory and thematic analysis of the enablers and barriers to finalise the identified factors. Results: A total of ten enablers and sixteen barriers were validated across both sites. However, differences in local contexts and operational procedures impacted future FV voucher scheme implementation. The important role of community food researchers to engage participants and support the synthesis of findings is also presented. Conclusions: This study offers practical and critical insights for researchers, community food researchers, and practitioners on factors that influence a community centre-based FV voucher scheme to address nutritional inequalities.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/120601
Identification Number/DOI 10.3390/nu17030483
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy > Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences > Human Nutrition Research Group
Publisher MDPI
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar