An investigation into the uncertainty revision process of professional forecasters

[thumbnail of ClemRichTrac_accepted.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 February 2027.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 February 2027

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Clements, M. P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-1341, Rich, R. and Tracy, J. (2025) An investigation into the uncertainty revision process of professional forecasters. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 173. 105060. ISSN 1879-1743 doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2025.105060

Abstract/Summary

Following Manzan (2021), this paper examines how professional forecasters revise their fixed-event uncertainty (variance) forecasts and tests the Bayesian learning prediction that variance forecasts should decrease as the horizon shortens. We show that Manzan’s (2021) use of first moment “efficiency” tests are not applicable to studying revisions of variance forecasts. Instead, we employ monotonicity tests developed by Patton and Timmermann (2012) in our first known application of these tests to second moments of survey expectations. We find strong evidence that the variance forecasts are consistent with the Bayesian learning prediction of declining monotonicity.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/120586
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.jedc.2025.105060
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar