Providing a framework for NATO’s human security approach

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Gilder, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8861-1433 and Linsdell, D. (2024) Providing a framework for NATO’s human security approach. Articles of War.

Abstract/Summary

This post explains why NATO sees Human Security as a useful tool and how the concept can be an enabler, improving NATO’s legitimacy and effectiveness. Noting Dan Stigall’s recent post in this symposium, we argue that NATO’s conceptual frameworks of Human Security, the Protection of Civilians (PoC) and Civilian Harm Mitigation (CHM) do not compete. We suggest that Human Security is a unique method of principled decision-making and can guide planning processes to improve outcomes on all of NATO’s cross-cutting topics (CCTs), including PoC and CHM. The post also highlights areas for future development in NATO’s current approach, arguing that NATO must establish its own evidence base for how to conceptualize and operationalize Human Security.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/120199
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Lieber Institute for Law & Land Warfare
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar