“Environmental migration” as advocacy: is it going to work?

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Mayer, B. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0669-7457 (2014) “Environmental migration” as advocacy: is it going to work? Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 29 (2). pp. 27-41. ISSN 1920-7336 doi: 10.25071/1920-7336.38165

Abstract/Summary

Can normative arguments for a governance of environmental migration succeed? The present analysis applies constructivist theories on norm entrepreneurship to the debate on the governance of environmental migration. Throughout the analysis, it appears that “environmental migration” is not constructed by one single, coherent norm entrepreneur. Rather, one may distinguish four normative enterprises that compete to use similar notions in the pursuit of divergent goals. They frame the issue of “environmental migration,” alternatively, as one of humanitarian assistance, forced migration, environmental sustainability, or international security. The article analyzes the prospect of each individual normative enterprise and their interactions. It concludes that norm entrepreneurs elaborating on a language of international security will likely have the greatest impact on the governance of environmental migration. Other normative enterprises are already permeated by the dominant language of fears.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/119415
Identification Number/DOI 10.25071/1920-7336.38165
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar