Courts, climate litigation and the evolution of earth system law

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Kotzé, L. J., Mayer, B. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0669-7457, van Asselt, H., Setzer, J., Biermann, F., Celis, N., Adelman, S., Lewis, B., Kennedy, A., Arling, H. and Peters, B. (2024) Courts, climate litigation and the evolution of earth system law. Global Policy, 15 (1). pp. 5-22. ISSN 1758-5899 doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.13291

Abstract/Summary

Numerous scientific reports have evidenced the transformation of the earth system due to human activities. These changes – captured under the term ‘Anthropocene’ – require a new perspective on global law and policy. The concept of ‘earth system law’ situates law in an earth system context and offers a new perspective to interrogate the role of law in governing planetary challenges such as climate change. The discourse on earth system law has not yet fully recognised courts as actors that could shape climate governance, while climate litigation discourse has insufficiently considered aspects of earth system law. We posit that courts play an increasingly influential climate governance role and that they need to be recognised as Anthropocene institutions within the earth system law paradigm. Drawing on a set of prominent climate cases, we discuss five inter-related domains that are relevant for earth system law and where the potential influence of courts can be discerned: establishing accountability, redefining power relations, remedying vulnerabilities and injustices, increasing the reach and impact of international climate law and applying climate science to adjudicate legal disputes. We suggest that their innovative work in these domains could provide a basis for positioning courts as planetary climate governance actors.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/119352
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.13291
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar