Fragmentation of the settlor’s role : identifying whose intention matters in fundraising appeal collection trusts

[thumbnail of Article - Fragmentation of Settlor Role in Appeal Collections TLI FORMAT.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Wilde, D. (2024) Fragmentation of the settlor’s role : identifying whose intention matters in fundraising appeal collection trusts. Trust Law International, 38 (2). pp. 64-82. ISSN 0962-2624

Abstract/Summary

Starting from the familiar, basic proposition that we interpret trusts according to ‘the intention of the settlor’, this article notes that the truth can be more complex. The height of this complexity appears to arise in fundraising appeal collection trusts. There the usual declaratory role of the settlor may in truth be fragmented between four different groups of people – the appeal initiators, their trustees, the legal advisors of either, and finally the donors – so that the intentions of any of these may need to be consulted on different issues of interpretation of the trust.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/119117
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Bloomsbury Professional
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar