The epistemic objection against perdurantism

Tullio, E. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5620-3888 and Soriani, T. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5648-4457 (2024) The epistemic objection against perdurantism. Synthese, 204 (3). 100. ISSN 1573-0964 doi: 10.1007/s11229-024-04758-x

Abstract/Summary

According to Perdurantism, persons are identical to maximal aggregates of appropriately interrelated temporal parts. Within the Perdurantist framework, an epistemic concern arises, targeting the perduring persons’ belief that they are persons, suggesting that, ultimately, they are not in a position to know that they are persons as opposed to temporal parts. Despite the consideration it has received over the years, this concern has not yet been converted into a full-fledged objection. This paper aims to address this gap by exploring the possibility of formulating a coherent Epistemic Objection against Perdurantism. We shall examine several epistemological principles around which such an objection might be built, arguing that none of them, in the end, allows a plausible formulation of the objection. As a result, we shall conclude that the burden of proving that in a Perdurantist setting persons are not in a position to know that they are persons rests with the objectors.

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/117971
Identification Number/DOI	10.1007/s11229-024-04758-x
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Publisher	Springer
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item