To dispense or not to dispense? Part 2

[thumbnail of Dispensing Powers PCB Part 2 clean.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Brook, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9716-9731 (2019) To dispense or not to dispense? Part 2. Private Client Business, 2019 (1). pp. 9-16.

Abstract/Summary

This is the second of a series of three linked articles examining the operation of dispensing powers in other common law jurisdictions. In the previous article (published in Private Client Business Issue 6 of 2018) the different legislative provisions in Australia, New Zealand, the United States (under the Uniform Probate Code) and South Africa were set out, and the type of testamentary intention that they required was analysed. This article focuses on the second key question for the operation of dispensing powers, namely how this testamentary intention is to be proved?

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/117907
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Uncontrolled Keywords Succession, Wills
Publisher Sweet and Maxwell Ltd.
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar