Reform of testamentary capacity: the hidden pitfalls of replacing Banks v Goodfellow with the Mental Capacity Act 2005

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Bedford, D. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9430-7737 and Brook, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9716-9731 (2024) Reform of testamentary capacity: the hidden pitfalls of replacing Banks v Goodfellow with the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Law Quarterly Review, 140 (1). pp. 34-60. ISSN 0023-933X

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/117899
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Sweet & Maxwell
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item
Full text not archived in this repository.
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar