Equitable allowances or restitutionary measures for dishonest assistance and knowing receipt

[thumbnail of RoG Eq v Rest for SSRN.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Whayman, D. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-5646 (2017) Equitable allowances or restitutionary measures for dishonest assistance and knowing receipt. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 68 (2). pp. 181-202. ISSN 0029-3105 doi: 10.53386/nilq.v68i2.34

Abstract/Summary

This article considers the credit given to dishonest assistants and knowing recipients in claims for disgorgement, with greater focus on dishonest assistance. Traditionally, equity has awarded a parsimonious ‘just allowance’ for work and skill. The language of causation in Novoship (UK) Ltd v Mikhaylyuk [2014] EWCA Civ 908 suggests a more generous restitutionary approach which is at odds with the justification given: prophylaxis. This tension makes the law incoherent. Moreover, the bar to full disgorgement has been set too high, such that the remedy is unavailable in practice. Therefore, even if the restitutionary approach is affirmed, it must be revised.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/117606
Identification Number/DOI 10.53386/nilq.v68i2.34
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar