Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Test of the negative feedback hypothesis of colony size sensing in social insects

[thumbnail of RSBL-2024-0102.R1_Proof_hi (1).pdf]
RSBL-2024-0102.R1_Proof_hi (1).pdf - Accepted Version (412kB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Kikuchi, T., Hayashi, Y. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9207-6322, Fujito, Y., Fujiwara-Tsujii, N., Kawabata, K., Sugawara, K., Yamaoka, R. and Tsuji, K. (2024) Test of the negative feedback hypothesis of colony size sensing in social insects. Biology Letters, 20 (6). ISSN 1744-957X doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0102

Abstract/Summary

Social insects can sense colony size—even without visual information in a dark environment. How they achieve this is yet largely unknown. We empirically tested a hypothesis on the proximate mechanism using ant colonies. In Diacamma colonies, the monogynous queen is known to increase the effort devoted to queen pheromone transmission behaviour (patrolling) as the colony grows, as if she perceives colony size. The negative feedback hypothesis assumes that, through repeated physical contact with workers, the queen monitors the physiological state (fertility) of workers and increases her patrolling effort when she encounters more fertile workers. Supporting this hypothesis, we found that the queen increased her patrolling effort in response to a higher ratio of fertile workers under the experimental condition of constant colony size. Furthermore, chemical analyses and bioassays suggested that cuticular hydrocarbons have queen pheromone activity and can mediate the observed queen–worker communication of fertility state. Such a self- organizing mechanism of sensing colony size may also operate in other social insects living in small colonies.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/117037
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics (CINN)
Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences > Department of Bio-Engineering
Publisher The Royal Society
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar