Environmental management accounting for strategic decision-making: a systematic literature review

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Sulphey, Ram, Tew forthcoming.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Swalih, M. M., Ram, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3130-6275 and Tew, E. (2024) Environmental management accounting for strategic decision-making: a systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment. ISSN 1099-0836 doi: 10.1002/bse.3828

Abstract/Summary

Heightened environmental concerns have prompted businesses to align with regulatory demands, fostering a need for internal accounting tools aiding managerial decision-making. While environmental management accounting (EMA) has become pivotal in supporting eco-efficiency decisions within organizations, a gap persists in comprehending its genuine, proactive implementation for sustainable development in existing literature. This study investigates why and how EMA is used for strategic decision-making. A systematic literature review of 89 studies were conducted, and factors influencing EMA usage for strategic decision-making were identified using the drivers–enablers–outcomes–barriers framework. Three reasons for EMA use in strategic decision-making were identified: legitimacy, organizational efficiency, and strategic sustainable development. This study highlights the evolving use of EMA within organizations, moving from short-term applications to recognizing its long-term potential for strategic sustainable development. It explains the changing motives behind EMA adoption, driven by factors that encourage the use of advanced EMA tools for proactive, long-term decision-making in sustainable development. The integration of these tools depends on internal organizational factors like management's environmental responsibility, and proactive leadership commitment to sustainability. By exploring theoretical underpinnings and motivations of enhanced EMA usage, this research contributes to pragmatic approaches in sustainability accounting, illustrating how organizations, initially adopting EMA for legitimacy, recognize its benefits in guiding proactive, solution-oriented managerial decisions towards strategic sustainable development.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/116529
Identification Number/DOI 10.1002/bse.3828
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar