Climate change and the politicisation of ESG in the US

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of ESG politicisation Feb 26 2024 final.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Hilson, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4114-6471 (2024) Climate change and the politicisation of ESG in the US. Frontiers in Political Science, 6. 1332399. ISSN 2673-3145 doi: 10.3389/fpos.2024.1332399

Abstract/Summary

ESG, or environmental, social, and governance, is seen by some as an instrument to tackle climate change, and by others as a tool to allow investors to assess climate change risks and opportunities. It has been widely politicised in the US, where Republican critics have characterised it as an attempt by the liberal financial elite to impose a leftist decarbonising mission on the US economy through an investment risk back door. The current paper explores the way in which ESG has become a, perhaps unlikely, object of politicisation by the political right. In doing so, it analyses the meaning of politicisation in an ESG context and the various forms it has taken, both discursive and substantive. The paper also seeks to explain why it is that ESG politicisation has occurred at particular junctures and draws on political opportunity theory from social movement studies to account for this. It further examines various reactions to the politicisation of ESG that have sought to depoliticise it.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/115718
Identification Number/DOI 10.3389/fpos.2024.1332399
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Frontiers
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar