Linking entrepreneurship to productivity: using a composite indicator for farm-level innovation in UK agriculture with secondary data

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of agriculture-2868108_Revised_Final.docx]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Gadanakis, Y. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7441-970X, Campos-González, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7348-1827 and Jones, P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3464-5424 (2024) Linking entrepreneurship to productivity: using a composite indicator for farm-level innovation in UK agriculture with secondary data. Agriculture, 14 (3). 409. ISSN 2077-0472 doi: 10.3390/agriculture14030409

Abstract/Summary

In agriculture, the intricate relationship between innovation, productivity, and entrepreneurship is underexplored. Despite the widely recognised role of innovation in driving productivity, concrete indicators and comprehensive farm-level studies are lacking. This research aims to unravel this complexity by exploring the impact of innovation, specifically in agricultural entrepreneurship, on transformative changes in farm productivity. The work presented in this manuscript explores how farm level data derived from the Farm Business Survey (FBS) for the period between 2003 – 2014, is used to identify innovators and, to assesses changes in productivity, technical efficiency, and economic efficiency. Therefore, it aims to contribute into comprehensively exploring the role of innovation, particularly within the context of entrepreneurship in agriculture, and its influence on driving transformative changes in farm productivity. Results reveal significant productivity varia-tion and a moderate overall improvement. Furthermore, investment in human resources, partic-ularly managerial input, significantly enhances farm productivity across various models, indicating experienced managers utilize technology effectively. Notably, management and human capital innovation drive positive productivity changes in the UK cereal sector for the period 2003 – 2014, surpassing technological advancements. Efficient farmers leverage experience to benefit from operational scale changes, emphasizing the importance of accumulated knowledge. Hence, policy interventions should recognize these nuances; while promoting vocational training aids technology adoption, it may not spur management innovation. Thus, strategies must balance various aspects to effectively foster innovation in agriculture, considering both technological and managerial ad-vancements for sustained productivity growth. The study advocates for a departure from the 'bigger is better' mentality, proposing educational programs and support services to encourage informed decision-making. This forward-looking approach aims to inform future policies and enhance understanding of the intricate dynamics between agricultural innovation, productivity, and entrepreneurship.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/115609
Identification Number/DOI 10.3390/agriculture14030409
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Farm Management Unit
Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Publisher MDPI AG
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar