Feyerabend, Experts, and Dilettantes

[thumbnail of Feyerabend, Experts & Dilettantes.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only until 13 June 2026.
Restricted to Repository staff only until 13 June 2026

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Preston, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3740-2308 (2024) Feyerabend, Experts, and Dilettantes. Philosophical Inquiries, 12 (1). pp. 89-106. ISSN 2282-0248 doi: 10.4454/philinq.v12i1.553

Abstract/Summary

Paul Feyerabend’s 1970 article “Experts in a Free Society” tries to make the case that scientific experts can only be tolerated if they are dilettantes. He uses Galileo, Newton and Kepler as examples of great scientists whose writing is nothing like that of contemporary “experts’, these latter being represented by the authors of the well-known book Human Sexual Response, Bill Masters and Virginia Johnson. He goes on to argue against the idea that the Scientific Revolution represented the triumph of empiricism. I take issue with the way Feyerabend represents Galileo as implacably opposed to empiricism, with his supposition that good science requires a particular personality, and with the way in which he represents the work of Masters and Johnson.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/115568
Identification Number/DOI 10.4454/philinq.v12i1.553
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Publisher Routledge
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar