On the estimation of Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall at extreme levels

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Accepted_Version.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Lazar, E. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8761-0754, Pan, J. and Wang, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2113-5521 (2024) On the estimation of Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall at extreme levels. Journal of Commodity Markets, 34. 100391. ISSN 2405-8513 doi: 10.1016/j.jcomm.2024.100391

Abstract/Summary

The estimation of risk at extreme levels (such as 0.1%) can be crucial to capture the losses during market downturns, such as the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 market crash. For many existing models, it is challenging to estimate risk at extreme levels. In order to improve such estimation, we develop a framework to estimate Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall at an extreme level by extending the one-factor GAS model and the hybrid GAS/GARCH model to estimate Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall for two levels simultaneously, namely for an extreme level and for a more common level (such as 10%). Our simulation results indicate that the proposed models outperform the GAS model benchmarks in terms of in-sample and out-of-sample loss values, as well as backtest rejection rates. We apply the proposed models to oil futures (WTI, Brent, gas oil and heating oil) and compare them with a range of parametric, nonparametric, and semiparametric alternatives. The results show that our proposed models are generally superior to the alternatives.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/115249
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.jcomm.2024.100391
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar