Evaluating atmospheric electricity changes as an indicator of fog formation

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Miller_etal2024.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Miller, C., Nicoll, K. A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5580-6325, Westbrook, C. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2889-8815 and Harrison, R. G. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0693-347X (2024) Evaluating atmospheric electricity changes as an indicator of fog formation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 150 (761). pp. 1892-1906. ISSN 1477-870X doi: 10.1002/qj.4680

Abstract/Summary

Fog is a high-impact weather phenomenon which is challenging to forecast accurately. Measuring changes in atmospheric electricity has been proposed as a complement to other fog prediction methods, since fog is known to produce changes in the potential gradient (PG). Many aspects of the relationship between PG and fog remain unexplored, to which modern instrumentation for continuous monitoring of PG and visibility brings a new perspective. We describe several automatic methods of detecting fog events and apply them to a large dataset to understand the evolution of the PG during fog development. The median PG increase in fog is found to be 58 V/m, which is statistically significant compared with the 17 V/m standard deviation of PG in the pre-fog hours. However, the median lead time of this increase before the fog onset was found to be 0.4 hours, compared to 0.6 hours using solely visibility data. While fewer fog events were able to be predicted using PG (55% of cases) than visibility (64% of cases), the PG was much more likely to give a longer lead time (of over 2 hours) than visibility (30% versus 13% respectively). This indicates that PG measurements would be a useful additional tool in fog prediction.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/114920
Identification Number/DOI 10.1002/qj.4680
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Publisher Royal Meteorological Society
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar