Race and international organizations

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Oksamytna von Billerbeck 2023 Race and International Organizations.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Oksamytna, K. and von Billerbeck, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-1944 (2024) Race and international organizations. International Studies Quarterly, 68 (2). sqae010. ISSN 1468-2478 doi: 10.1093/isq/sqae010

Abstract/Summary

While International Relations scholarship has increasingly addressed questions of race, the literature on international organizations (IOs) has been slower to do so. In particular, it has neglected how race functions within IO workforces. Building on sociological theories of racialized organizations, we develop the concept of racialized IOs. Like domestic organizations, IOs are characterized by enhanced or inhibited agency of racial groups, racialized distribution of resources, credentialing of whiteness, and decoupling of formal rules and informal practices along racial lines. However, IOs display two important differences. First, IOs rely on member states for resources, which requires accommodating powerful white-majority countries (macro-level pressures). Second, since IO workforces are diverse, their employees possess or develop a range of racial stereotypes (micro-level pressures). Using the case of UN peacekeeping, we demonstrate how the four features of racialized organizations operate in light of these macro- and micro-level pressures. We show how locally-hired peacekeeping staff in Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean face constraints on exercising agency; how non-white peacekeepers perform more dangerous jobs than their white counterparts; how whiteness serves as a proxy for desirable skills, while non-white peacekeepers’ knowledge is devalued; and how peacekeepers from white-majority countries receive special treatment or deviate from UN-wide procedures.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/114436
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/isq/sqae010
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations
Uncontrolled Keywords race, international organizations, peacekeeping
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar