The negative footprint illusion is exacerbated by the numerosity of environment-friendly additions: unveiling the underpinning mechanisms

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of 27th November Manuscript Number NFI.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Andersson, H., Holmgren, M., Sörqvist, P., Threadgold, E., Beaman, C. P. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5124-242X, Ball, L. J. and Marsh, J. E. (2024) The negative footprint illusion is exacerbated by the numerosity of environment-friendly additions: unveiling the underpinning mechanisms. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 36 (2). pp. 295-307. ISSN 2044-592X doi: 10.1080/20445911.2024.2313568

Abstract/Summary

The addition of environmentally friendly items to a set of conventional items sometimes leads people to believe that the carbon footprint of the entire set decreases rather than increases. This negative footprint illusion is supposedly underpinned by an averaging bias: people base environmental impact estimates not on the total impact of items but on their average. However, direct evidence for this underpinning mechanism is sparse. In the current paper, we tested novel predictions of the averaging-bias account. We found that the illusion’s magnitude increased with the addition of a greater number of “green” items when the number of conventional items was held constant (Studies 1 and 2), thus providing further support for the averaging bias account. We also challenged the account by testing what happens when the number of items in the conventional and “green” categories vary while holding the ratio between the two categories constant (Study 3). At odds with the averaging account, the magnitude of the illusion increased as the category size increased, thus revealing a potential role of a category-size bias. The results raise questions regarding the potential interplay between these two types of bias in the negative footprint illusion.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/114293
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/20445911.2024.2313568
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Language and Cognition
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar