Cleansing investor’s conscience: the effects of incidental guilt on socially responsible investment decisions

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of Cleansing investor conscience_JBE_paper_2ndR_Oct_23.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Gevorkova, V., Sangiorgi, I. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8344-9983 and Vogt, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3178-2805 (2023) Cleansing investor’s conscience: the effects of incidental guilt on socially responsible investment decisions. Journal of Business Ethics. ISSN 1573-0697 doi: 10.1007/s10551-023-05585-9

Abstract/Summary

This paper explores the effects of incidental guilt on Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) decisions of retail investors. Do investors who feel guilty invest more in SRIs to clear their conscience? Are guilty investors willing to sacrifice returns to restore their moral selves? Using survey data from an online quasi-experiment among a sample of U.S. retail investors, we find that individuals who experience incidental guilt are willing to invest more in SRI funds than those in a neutral state. We show that this effect, albeit moderate in magnitude, cannot be explained solely by differences in retail investors’ moral reasoning, attitudes towards social responsibility, risk tolerance and demographic factors. When presented with a trade-off between sustainability, risk and return characteristics of the funds, guilty investors are more willing to sacrifice returns for greater sustainability than non-guilty participants. Our research provides new evidence of the effect that incidental guilt has on the sustainable investing decisions of retail investors.

Altmetric Badge

Additional Information J.E.L. Classifications: G11, M14, A13, D91, C25
Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/114231
Identification Number/DOI 10.1007/s10551-023-05585-9
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Uncontrolled Keywords Retail investors, socially responsible investment, morality, psychological motives, guilt, emotions.
Additional Information J.E.L. Classifications: G11, M14, A13, D91, C25
Publisher Springer
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar