Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Investigating differences between Tropical cyclone detection systems

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
113917 VoR.pdf - Published Version (2MB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Galea_etal_paper2_2023.pdf]
Galea_etal_paper2_2023.pdf - Accepted Version (1MB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Galea, D., Hodges, K. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0894-229X and Lawrence, B. N. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-7860 (2024) Investigating differences between Tropical cyclone detection systems. Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems, 3 (2). e220046. ISSN 2769-7525 doi: 10.1175/AIES-D-22-0046.1

Abstract/Summary

Tropical cyclones (TCs) are important phenomena, and understanding their behavior requires being able to detect their presence in simulations. Detection algorithms vary; here we compare a novel deep learning–based detection algorithm (TCDetect) with a state-of-the-art tracking system (TRACK) and an observational dataset (IBTrACS) to provide context for potential use in climate simulations. Previous work has shown that TCDetect has good recall, particularly for hurricane-strength events. The primary question addressed here is to what extent the structure of the systems plays a part in detection. To compare with observations of TCs, it is necessary to apply detection techniques to reanalysis. For this purpose, we use ERA-Interim, and a key part of the comparison is the recognition that ERA-Interim itself does not fully reflect the observations. Despite that limitation, both TCDetect and TRACK applied to ERA-Interim mostly agree with each other. Also, when considering only hurricane-strength TCs, TCDetect and TRACK correspond well to the TC observations from IBTrACS. Like TRACK, TCDetect has good recall for strong systems; however, it finds a significant number of false positives associated with weaker TCs (i.e., events detected as having hurricane strength but are weaker in reality) and extratropical storms. Because TCDetect was not trained to locate TCs, a post hoc method to perform comparisons was used. Although this method was not always successful, some success in matching tracks and events in physical space was also achieved. The analysis of matches suggested that the best results were found in the Northern Hemisphere and that in most regions the detections followed the same patterns in time no matter which detection method was used.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/113917
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Computer Science
Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > NCAS
Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Publisher American Meteorological Society
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar