Empirical investigation of different factor structures for the eating disorder examination–questionnaire in adult women with anorexia nervosa

[thumbnail of EDE-Q in AN Final.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Jenkins, P. E. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1673-2903, Blalock, D. V., Duffy, A., Mehler, P. S. and Rienecke, R. D. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0423-7403 (2023) Empirical investigation of different factor structures for the eating disorder examination–questionnaire in adult women with anorexia nervosa. Assessment. ISSN 1552-3489 doi: 10.1177/10731911231198207

Abstract/Summary

The Eating Disorder Examination–Questionnaire (EDE-Q) is a widely used self-report measure of eating pathology. Despite widespread use, investigations of its factor structure have proved inconclusive and rarely supported the “original” interpretation. The current study evaluates several proposed factor solutions of the EDE-Q using latent variable analysis in a sample of adult women with anorexia nervosa (AN). A total of 804 patients from a specialist treatment center in the United States participated in the study. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on 22 EDE-Q items assessing attitudinal features of eating pathology. Findings suggested that three full-item versions (none of which was the “original” interpretation) fit the data adequately, with a brief, seven-item version showing excellent fit. The study is one of the first to examine this within a sample of women with AN and provides an empirical foundation for how best to use the EDE-Q among clinical and research participants with AN. Findings suggest that the “original” factor structure lacks structural validity in women with AN. Its use should generally be discouraged, and future work on screening and treatment outcomes might consider the EDE-Q7.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/113420
Identification Number/DOI 10.1177/10731911231198207
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Uncontrolled Keywords Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology
Publisher SAGE Publications
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar