The nature of Saunders v Vautier applications: does the court have a discretion to refuse?

[thumbnail of Article - Saunders v Vautier discretion CURRENT TEXT.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Wilde, D. (2023) The nature of Saunders v Vautier applications: does the court have a discretion to refuse? Trust Law International, 37 (2). pp. 67-88. ISSN 0962-2624

Abstract/Summary

Argues the rule in Saunders v Vautier (allowing trust assets to be taken in disregard of trust terms) cannot be explained – as it usually is – as a right derived from equitable beneficial ‘ownership’: because such ownership is absent in many cases where the power is exercisable. And argues that the courts have a discretion to refuse Saunders v Vautier applications.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/112982
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Bloomsbury Professional
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar