Section 48 orders in the Court of Protection: undermining autonomy or an honest account of interim judging?

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Lindsey, J. (2023) Section 48 orders in the Court of Protection: undermining autonomy or an honest account of interim judging? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 45 (3). pp. 294-297. ISSN 1469-9621 doi: 10.1080/09649069.2023.2243152

Abstract/Summary

This case note considers the role of section 48 orders under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 following the decision by Mostyn J in A Local Authority v LD and RD [2023] EWHC 1258 (Fam). The case concerned an application for removal from home for a man in his 40s with learning disability, autism and Down’s Syndrome for the purposes of assessment of mental capacity. The case note considers the role and function of interim orders under section 48 as well as the wider problem of removing adults from their own home in the name of safeguarding.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/112962
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/09649069.2023.2243152
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Informa UK Limited
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar