Revisiting coercion as an element of prohibited intervention in international law

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of SSRN-id4504816.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Milanovic, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3880-6096 (2023) Revisiting coercion as an element of prohibited intervention in international law. American Journal of International Law, 117 (4). pp. 601-650. ISSN 2161-7953 doi: 10.1017/ajil.2023.40

Abstract/Summary

International law prohibits states from intervening in the internal and external affairs of other states, but only if the method of intervention is coercive. This Article argues that coercion can be understood in two different ways or models. First, as coercion-as-extortion, a demand coupled with a threat of harm or the infliction of harm, done to extract some kind of concession from the victim state—in other words, an act targeting the victim state's will or decision-making calculus. Second, as coercion-as-control, an action materially depriving the victim state of its ability to control its sovereign choices. This may be done even through acts like cyber operations that the victim state is entirely unaware of. The Article argues that many of the difficulties surrounding the notion of coercion arise as a consequence of failing to distinguish between these two different models.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/112577
Identification Number/DOI 10.1017/ajil.2023.40
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar