AgroEcoList 1.0: a checklist to improve reporting standards in ecological research in agriculture

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Daykin, G. M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8636-8954, Aizen, M. A., Barrett, L. G., Bartlett, L. J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4418-8071, Batáry, P., Garibaldi, L. A., Güncan, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-648X, Gutam, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5376-1565, Maas, B., Mitnala, J., Montaño-Centellas, F., Muoni, T., Öckinger, E., Okechalu, O., Ostler, R., Potts, S. G. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-980X, Rose, D. C., Topp, C. F. E., Usieta, H. O., Utoblo, O. G., Watson, C., Zou, Y., Sutherland, W. J. and Hood, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-0603 (2023) AgroEcoList 1.0: a checklist to improve reporting standards in ecological research in agriculture. PLoS ONE, 18 (6). e0285478. ISSN 1932-6203 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285478

Abstract/Summary

Many publications lack sufficient background information (e.g. location) to be interpreted, replicated, or reused for synthesis. This impedes scientific progress and the application of science to practice. Reporting guidelines (e.g. checklists) improve reporting standards. They have been widely taken up in the medical sciences, but not in ecological and agricultural research. Here, we use a community-centred approach to develop a reporting checklist (AgroEcoList 1.0) through surveys and workshops with 23 experts and the wider agroecological community. To put AgroEcoList in context, we also assessed the agroecological community's perception of reporting standards in agroecology. A total of 345 researchers, reviewers, and editors, responded to our survey. Although only 32% of respondents had prior knowledge of reporting guidelines, 76% of those that had said guidelines improved reporting standards. Overall, respondents agreed on the need of AgroEcolist 1.0; only 24% of respondents had used reporting guidelines before, but 78% indicated they would use AgroEcoList 1.0. We updated AgroecoList 1.0 based on respondents' feedback and user-testing. AgroecoList 1.0 consists of 42 variables in seven groups: experimental/sampling set-up, study site, soil, livestock management, crop and grassland management, outputs, and finances. It is presented here, and is also available on github (https://github.com/AgroecoList/Agroecolist). AgroEcoList 1.0 can serve as a guide for authors, reviewers, and editors to improve reporting standards in agricultural ecology. Our community-centred approach is a replicable method that could be adapted to develop reporting checklists in other fields. Reporting guidelines such as AgroEcoList can improve reporting standards and therefore the application of research to practice, and we recommend that they are adopted more widely in agriculture and ecology.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/112335
Identification Number/DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0285478
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Sustainable Land Management > Centre for Agri-environmental Research (CAER)
Uncontrolled Keywords Animals, Soil, Knowledge, Agriculture, Checklist, Livestock
Publisher Public Library of Science
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar