British perspectives on the GATT Article XXIV negotiations following the first EC enlargement: ‘Probably more important and more difficult than the consideration of the Treaty of Rome itself’

[thumbnail of IntHReview_British_Anon.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Swinbank, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2526-2026 (2023) British perspectives on the GATT Article XXIV negotiations following the first EC enlargement: ‘Probably more important and more difficult than the consideration of the Treaty of Rome itself’. International History Review, 45 (5). pp. 824-841. ISSN 1949-6540 doi: 10.1080/07075332.2023.2220337

Abstract/Summary

The accession of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom (UK) to the European Communities (EC) in 1973 triggered negotiations in GATT (the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade). GATT’s contracting parties were entitled to ask whether the enlarged EC adequately fulfilled the criteria for a Customs Union (CU) that Article XXIV set; and countries whose market access to the acceding states was impaired because of changes to tariff bindings could seek redress. The formal negotiations, following on from President Richard Nixon’s announcement of his New Economic Policy in August 1971, began in March 1972, and concluded in July 1974. The USA—the EC’s main interlocuter—whilst supporting European integration from a political perspective, was highly critical of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), and the EC’s web of preferential trade agreements. The UK, fearful that disagreement could trigger trade conflict, attempted to mediate between the two, trying to curb US expectations whilst nudging its EC partners to be more generous in their tariff concessions. But, as in the Dillon Round, the EC tenaciously rebuffed criticism whilst defending its right to expand its CU. The CAP emerged more-orless unscathed.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/112238
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/07075332.2023.2220337
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar