A data-driven energy performance gap prediction model using machine learning

[thumbnail of Final Manuscript-renewablenergy.pdf]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Yilmaz, D., Tanyer, A. M. and Toker, İ. D. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6988-7557 (2023) A data-driven energy performance gap prediction model using machine learning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 181. 113318. ISSN 1879-0690 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113318

Abstract/Summary

The energy performance gap is a significant obstacle to the realization of ambitions to mitigate the environmental impact of buildings. Although extensive research has been conducted on the causes, minimization, or the quantifying of the energy performance gap in buildings, comparatively minimal work has been done on raising decision-makers awareness of a potential gap. This paper positions project risks at the core of the gap and proposes an innovative performance gap prediction model focusing on heating and electricity demand in buildings by utilizing the machine learning classification. In this research, the performance gap and project risks of 77 buildings was collected via a web-based survey. The predictive performance of the four machine learning algorithms, namely i) Naive Bayes, ii) k-Nearest Neighbors, iii) Support Vector Machine, and iv) Random Forest, were compared to determine the best model. The results obtained revealed that Naive Bayes was better able to predict the direction of the heating performance gap (72.50%), the negative heating performance gap (71.81%), the positive electricity performance gap (77.08%), and the negative electricity performance gap (83.85%). Furthermore, k-Nearest Neighbors and Support Vector Machine were more accurate to predict the direction of the electricity performance gap (79.00%), and the positive heating performance gap (76.04%).

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/111874
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113318
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of the Built Environment > Construction Management and Engineering
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar