Understanding ‘it depends’ in ecology: a guide to hypothesising, visualising and interpreting statistical interactions

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
[thumbnail of Spake_edited_RS.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only
[thumbnail of SupportingInformation_edited_RS.pdf]
Text - Supplemental Material
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Spake, R. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4671-2225, Bowler, D. E., Callaghan, C. T., Blowes, S. A., Doncaster, C. P., Antao, L. H., Nakagawa, S., McElreath, R. and Chase, J. M. (2023) Understanding ‘it depends’ in ecology: a guide to hypothesising, visualising and interpreting statistical interactions. Biological Reviews, 98 (4). pp. 983-1002. ISSN 1469-185X doi: 10.1111/brv.12939

Abstract/Summary

Ecologists routinely use statistical models to detect and explain interactions among ecological drivers, with a goal to evaluate whether an effect of interest changes in sign or magnitude in different contexts. Two fundamental properties of interactions are often overlooked during the process of hypothesising, visualising and interpreting interactions between drivers: the measurement scale – whether a response is analysed on an additive or multiplicative scale, such as a ratio or logarithmic scale; and the symmetry – whether dependencies are considered in both directions. Overlooking these properties can lead to one or more of three inferential errors: misinterpretation of (i) the detection and magnitude (Type-D error), and (ii) the sign of effect modification (Type-S error); and (iii) misidentification of the underlying processes (Type-A error). We illustrate each of these errors with a broad range of ecological questions applied to empirical and simulated data sets. We demonstrate how meta-analysis, a widely used approach that seeks explicitly to characterise context dependence, is especially prone to all three errors. Based on these insights, we propose guidelines to improve hypothesis generation, testing, visualisation and interpretation of interactions in ecology.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/110540
Identification Number/DOI 10.1111/brv.12939
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences > Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar