A psychometric approach to assess justice perceptions in support of the governance of agricultural sustainability transitions

[thumbnail of Open access]
Preview
Text (Open access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Accepted manuscript de Boon et al. - A psychometric approach to assess justice perceptions in support of the governance of agricultural sustainability transitions.pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

de Boon, A., Dressel, S., Sandström, C. and Rose, D. C. (2023) A psychometric approach to assess justice perceptions in support of the governance of agricultural sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 46. 100694. ISSN 2210-4232 doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2023.100694

Abstract/Summary

There is consensus that we need sustainability transitions and increasing acknowledgement that such transitions should be conducted in a just manner. However, what exactly a ‘just transition’ means and how this should be brought about is less clear. Attempts to examine the justice of transitions to date primarily rely on normative interpretations of what justice means. Using the English agricultural transition as a case, we develop an instrument that builds on the underlying dimensions of justice evaluations to provide a tool for decision-makers to gain insights into societal perceptions of what a just agricultural transition means to them. When adapted, this instrument is also valuable for sustainability transitions in other sectors. We establish adequate construct reliability and validity for a number of constructs such as Equality, Entitlement, and Merit as Principles of Procedural Justice, whilst others such as the different Topics of Distributional Justice will need further refinement.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/109893
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2023.100694
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Sustainable Land Management
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar