Al-Skeini and Al-Jedda in Strasbourg

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Milanovic, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3880-6096 (2012) Al-Skeini and Al-Jedda in Strasbourg. European Journal of International Law, 23 (1). pp. 121-139. ISSN 1464-3596 doi: 10.1093/ejil/chr102

Abstract/Summary

The article analyses the European Court of Human Rights’ recent judgments in Al-Skeini v. United Kingdom and Al-Jedda v. United Kingdom. The former is set to become the leading Strasbourg authority on the extraterritorial application of the ECHR; the latter presents significant developments with regard to issues such as the dual attribution of conduct to states and to international organizations, norm conflict, the relationship between the ECHR and general international law, and the ability or inability of UN Security Council decisions to displace human rights treaties by virtue of Article 103 of the UN Charter. The article critically examines the reasoning behind the two judgments, as well as their broad policy implications regarding ECHR member state action abroad and their implementation of various Security Council measures.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/108029
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/ejil/chr102
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar