Fairness as comparative desert

Download

Preview

Text (Open access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading. | Preview

Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives

Advice

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Tools

Lists

Wu, S. D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-9766 (2022) Fairness as comparative desert. Ratio, 35 (4). pp. 321-332. ISSN 1467-9329 doi: 10.1111/rati.12358

Abstract/Summary

One prominent theory of fairness is John Broome's. This article identifies several problems with Broome's theory but defends Broome's claim that fairness requires the proportionate satisfaction of claims. This article also shows how Broome's conception of fairness is compatible with fairness as comparative desert.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/107574
Identification Number/DOI	10.1111/rati.12358
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Uncontrolled Keywords	desert, equality, fairness, justice, lotteries, rights
Publisher	Wiley
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Deposit Details

Date Deposited:	07 Oct 2022 10:51	Date item deposited into CentAUR
Last Modified:	23 Jun 2024 08:34	Date item last modified

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar