Organizational narratives and self-legitimation in international organizations

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of Organizational Narratives and Self-Legitimation in IOs REVISION (named, clean).pdf]
Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

von Billerbeck, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-1944 (2023) Organizational narratives and self-legitimation in international organizations. International Affairs, 99 (3). pp. 963-981. ISSN 1468-2346 doi: 10.1093/ia/iiac263

Abstract/Summary

A growing literature has examined how international organizations (IOs) use narratives for self-legitimation—legitimation aimed not at external audiences but at IO staff themselves. However, little work examines why some self-legitimation narratives ‘stick’ and others fade away or are challenged by counter-narratives. I address this question by focusing on how the content of self-legitimation narratives. First, I describe the lifecycle of self-legitimation narratives in IOs, showing how they can be endorsed, rejected, or challenged by legitimacy audiences. Next, I posit a three-part typology of narrative content: purpose, performance, and politics. Drawing on 87 interviews with IO staff, I argue that narratives of purpose, which focus on organizational values and norms, are more likely to be endorsed and become dominant, while those that focus on performance or politics are more likely to be rejected or challenged. Where this happens, legitimacy agents must adjust narrative content in line with audience demands. I illustrate this with two case studies from the UN. I conclude with the policy implications of these findings, in particular the importance for IO leaders to align internal messaging with the values and normative expectations of staff or risk staff demotivation and cynicism, ultimately imperilling organizational effectiveness.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/107301
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/ia/iiac263
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations
Publisher Oxford University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar