A global streamflow reanalysis for 1980–2018

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Alfieri, L. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0992-3667, Lorini, V., Hirpa, F. A., Harrigan, S. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4919-4753, Zsoter, E., Prudhomme, C. and Salamon, P. (2020) A global streamflow reanalysis for 1980–2018. Journal of Hydrology X, 6. 100049. ISSN 0022-1694 doi: 10.1016/j.hydroa.2019.100049

Abstract/Summary

Global and continental scale hydrological reanalysis datasets receive growing attention due to their increasing number of applications, ranging from water resources management, climate change studies, water related hazards and policy support. Until recently, their use was mostly limited to qualitative assessments, due to their coarse spatial and temporal resolution, large uncertainty and bias in the model output, and limited extent of the dataset in space and time. This research reports on the setup of a gridded hydrological model with quasi-global coverage, able to reproduce a seamless 39-year streamflow simulation in all world’s medium to large river basins. The model was calibrated at 1226 river sections with a total drainage area of 51 million km2 within 66 countries, using ECMWF’s latest atmospheric reanalysis ERA5. A performance assessment revealed large improvements in reproducing past discharge observations, in comparison to the calibration used in the current operational setup of the hydrological model as part of the Copernicus – Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS, www.globalfloods.eu), with median scores of Kling-Gupta Efficiency KGE = 0.67 and correlation r = 0.8. The simulation bias was also dramatically reduced and narrowed around zero, with more than 60% of stations showing percent bias within ±20%. Pronounced regional differences in the simulation results remain, pointing out the need for detailed investigation of the hydrological processes in specific regions, including parts of Africa and South Asia. In addition, observed discharges with high data quality is key to achieving skillful model output. The new calibrated model will become part of the operational runs of GloFAS in the next system release foreseen for Spring 2020, together with a near real time extension of the streamflow reanalysis.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/106801
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.hydroa.2019.100049
Divisions Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Department of Geography and Environmental Science
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar