Wittgenstein on necessity: ‘Are you not really an idealist in disguise?'

Couldrick, S. W. A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9703-2900 (2022) Wittgenstein on necessity: ‘Are you not really an idealist in disguise?'. Analytic Philosophy. ISSN 2153-960X doi: 10.1111/phib.12273

Abstract/Summary

Wittgenstein characterises ‘necessary truths’ as rules of representation that do not answer to reality. The invocation of rules of representation has led many to compare his work with Kant's. This comparison is illuminating, but it can also be misleading. Some go as far as casting Wittgenstein's later philosophy as a specie of transcendental idealism, an interpretation that continues to gather support despite scholars pointing to its limitations. To understand the temptation of this interpretation, attention must be paid to a distinction Bernard Williams (1981) makes, echoing Kant, between empirical and transcendental idealism. Williams claims that the move to transcendental idealism is an effort to block empirical idealism. The latter, in this context, amounts to a scepticism regarding necessity and a denial of its objectivity. To show what is wrong with the transcendental interpretation, it is important to challenge the mistaken presumption that Wittgenstein's philosophy would otherwise lead to empirical idealism. The fundamental mistake common to both attributions is that they misunderstand the relation that obtains between our rules of representation and the contingent facts that condition those rules of representation. Once this relation has been clarified, Wittgenstein's philosophy can be understood as providing a genuine alternative to realism and idealism.

Item Type	Article
URI	https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/106561
Identification Number/DOI	10.1111/phib.12273
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Publisher	Wiley
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item