Boomsma, C., Goodhew, J., Pahl, S. and Jones, R. V.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2716-9872
(2016)
The feasibility of saving energy in challenging organisational contexts: testing energy visualisation in a social services office in the United Kingdom.
Energy Research & Social Science, 15.
pp. 58-74.
ISSN 2214-6296
doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.02.004
Abstract/Summary
The workplace offers opportunities for energy savings, but few studies have evaluated the effect of energy feedback in offices. This paper reports a case study of an energy visualisation intervention among social care staff. The research examined the role of feedback design (simple graphs vs. visualisation) and discusses the feasibility of implementing a near real-time visual feedback intervention into a work setting with staff keenly aware of their primary job roles. The findings show a staff sample with positive beliefs towards energy saving, but bounded by low feelings of self-efficacy, weak social norms, and perceived barriers in the office. Feedback may have supported feelings of collective efficacy and encouraged staff to talk with colleagues about ways to save energy. But engagement with feedback – and energy use in general – was limited. Energy use was embedded in other concerns and issues, such as a strong team culture and wider problems in the building. The case study highlights the complexities of energy-related behaviours in the workplace and the role visualising energy could play in this context. Engagement will be a key challenge in achieving successful feedback initiatives; we provide recommendations to tackle this challenge and identify areas for future research.
Altmetric Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/106182 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1016/j.erss.2016.02.004 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | No Reading authors. Back catalogue items Science > School of the Built Environment > Construction Management and Engineering Science > School of the Built Environment > Energy and Environmental Engineering group |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download