Curtis, M. J., Alexander, S. P. H., Cirino, G., George, C. H., Kendall, D. A., Insel, P. A., Izzo, A. A., Ji, Y., Panettieri, R. A., Patel, H. H., Sobey, C. G., Stanford, S. C., Stanley, P., Stefanska, B., Stephens, G. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8966-4238, Teixeira, M. M., Vergnolle, N. and Ahluwalia, A.
(2022)
Planning experiments: updated guidance on experimental design and analysis and their reporting III.
British Journal of Pharmacology, 179 (15).
pp. 3907-3913.
ISSN 0007-1188
doi: 10.1111/bph.15868
Abstract/Summary
Scientists who plan to publish in British Journal of Pharma- cology (BJP) must read this article before undertaking a study. This editorial provides guidance for the design of experiments. We have published previously two guidance documents on experimental design and analysis (Curtis et al., 2015; Curtis et al., 2018). This update clarifies and simplifies the requirements on design and analysis for BJP manuscripts. This editorial also details updated require- ments following an audit and discussion on best practice by the BJP editorial board. Explanations for the require- ments are provided in the previous articles. Here, we address new issues that have arisen in the course of han- dling manuscripts and emphasise three aspects of design that continue to present the greatest challenge to authors: randomisation, blinded analysis and balance of group sizes.
Altmetric Badge
Item Type | Article |
URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/105918 |
Item Type | Article |
Refereed | Yes |
Divisions | Interdisciplinary Research Centres (IDRCs) > Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics (CINN) Life Sciences > School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy > School of Pharmacy > Division of Pharmacology |
Publisher | Wiley |
Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record