School-based screening for childhood anxiety problems and intervention delivery: a codesign approach

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Williamson, V. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3110-9856, Larkin, M., Reardon, T., Pearcey, S., Button, R., Green, I., Hill, C., Stallard, P., Spence, S. H., Breen, M., Mcdonald, I., Ukoumunne, O. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0551-9157, Ford, T., Violato, M., Sniehotta, F., Stainer, J., Gray, A. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0239-7278, Brown, P., Sancho, M., Morgan, F., Jasper, B. and Creswell, C. (2022) School-based screening for childhood anxiety problems and intervention delivery: a codesign approach. BMJ Open, 12 (6). e058089. ISSN 2044-6055 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058089

Abstract/Summary

Objectives: A very small proportion of children with anxiety problems receive evidence-based treatment. Barriers to access include difficulties with problem identification, concerns about stigma and a lack of clarity about how to access specialist services and their limited availability. A school-based programme that integrates screening to identify those children who are most likely to be experiencing anxiety problems with the offer of intervention has the potential to overcome many of these barriers. This article is a process-based account of how we used codesign to develop a primary school-based screening and intervention programme for child anxiety problems. Design: Codesign. Setting: UK primary schools. Participants: Data were collected from year 4 children (aged 8–9 years), parents, school staff and mental health practitioners. Results: We report how the developed programme was experienced and perceived by a range of users, including parents, children, school staff and mental health practitioners, as well as how the programme was adapted following user feedback. Conclusions: We reflect on the mitigation techniques we employed, the lessons learnt from the codesign process and give recommendations that may inform the development and implementation of future school-based screening and intervention programmes.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/105848
Identification Number/DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058089
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Anxiety and Depression in Young People (AnDY)
Uncontrolled Keywords Mental health, 1506, 1712, education & training (see Medical Education & Training), mental health, paediatrics
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar