Search from over 60,000 research works

Advanced Search

Evaluating the impact of post-processing medium-range ensemble streamflow forecasts from the European Flood Awareness System

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
hess-26-2939-2022.pdf - Published Version (6MB) | Preview
Available under license: Creative Commons Attribution
[thumbnail of hess-2021-539-manuscript-final.pdf]
hess-2021-539-manuscript-final.pdf - Accepted Version (11MB)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Matthews, G., Barnard, C., Cloke, H. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1472-868X, Dance, S. L. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1690-3338, Jurlina, T., Mazzetti, C. and Prudhomme, C. (2022) Evaluating the impact of post-processing medium-range ensemble streamflow forecasts from the European Flood Awareness System. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 26 (11). pp. 2939-2968. ISSN 1027-5606 doi: 10.5194/hess-26-2939-2022

Abstract/Summary

Streamflow forecasts provide vital information to aid emergency response preparedness and disaster risk reduction. Medium-range forecasts are created by forcing a hydrological model with output from numerical weather prediction systems. Uncertainties are unavoidably introduced throughout the system and can reduce the skill of the streamflow forecasts. Postprocessing is a method used to quantify and reduce the overall uncertainties in order to improve the usefulness of the forecasts. The post-processing method that is used within the operational European Flood Awareness System is based on the Model Conditional Processor and the Ensemble Model Output Statistics method. Using 2-years of reforecasts with daily timesteps this method is evaluated for 522 stations across Europe. Post-processing was found to increase the skill of the forecasts at the majority of stations both in terms of the accuracy of the forecast median and the reliability of the forecast probability distribution. This improvement is seen at all lead-times (up to 15 days) but is largest at short lead-times. The greatest improvement was seen in low-lying, large catchments with long response times, whereas for catchments at high elevation and with very short response times the forecasts often failed to capture the magnitude of peak flows. Additionally, the quality and length of the observational time-series used in the offline calibration of the method were found to be important. This evaluation of the post-processing method, and specifically the new information provided on characteristics that affect the performance of the method, will aid end-users to make more informed decisions. It also highlights the potential issues that may be encountered when developing new post-processing methods.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/105223
Item Type Article
Refereed Yes
Divisions Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Department of Geography and Environmental Science
Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > National Centre for Earth Observation (NCEO)
Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Mathematics and Statistics
Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
Publisher Copernicus
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar