Alexander, C., Sato, M. and Zanghellini, A.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8997-4941
(2023)
State-enabled killing of same-sex attracted people: a legal pluralist account.
Law & Social Inquiry, 48 (3).
pp. 719-747.
ISSN 1747-4469
doi: 10.1017/lsi.2022.48
Abstract/Summary
In eleven countries, same-sex sexual intimacy is punishable by death. Applying a legal pluralistic framework, we argue that ‘State-enabled killing’ of same-sex attracted people occurs in at least 23 countries. State-enabled killings range from extrajudicial and quasi-judicial killings, where State actors carry out the killing; through instances where the State retrospectively authorises, through bias or lawful excuses to homicide, the killing of same-sex attracted people by private actors; to cases where the State permits or endorses forms of so-called ‘conversion therapy’ that lead to death. We contend that a narrow focus on the death penalty as the only genuine form of State-enabled killing of same-sex attracted people is analytically unwarranted and strategically dubious in terms of law reform advocacy. Critical legal pluralism allows us to pursue the practical and normative implications of hypothesising a functional equivalence between the death penalty and these other forms of State-enabled killing.
Altmetric Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/105093 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.1017/lsi.2022.48 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download