The Supreme court and the conventions of the constitution

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Sirota, L. (2017) The Supreme court and the conventions of the constitution. The Supreme Court law Review, 78. ISSN 0225-0108

Abstract/Summary

Conventions are among the most important rules of the Canadian constitution. Yet orthodox legal theory does not recognize them as being rules of law, a view which the Supreme Court of Canada endorsed in the Patriation Reference. Nevertheless, both before and after the Patriation Reference, the Court's jurisprudence engaged with existing or alleged constitutional conventions. This article reviews this jurisprudence, and the scholarly commentary that responded to it. It concludes that the Court's endorsement of the orthodox view that there exists a rigid separation between conventions and law was poorly justified, and ought to be abandoned.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/104114
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Osgoode Hall Law School of York University
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar