Meta‐analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how?

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
| Preview

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Paul, J. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5062-8371 and Barari, M. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6905-4897 (2022) Meta‐analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how? Psychology & Marketing. ISSN 1520-6793 doi: 10.1002/mar.21657

Abstract/Summary

Meta‐analysis is a research method for systematically combining and synthesizing findings from multiple quantitative studies in a research domain. Despite its importance, most literature evaluating meta‐analyses are based on data analysis and statistical discussions. This paper takes a holistic view, comparing meta‐analyses to traditional systematic literature reviews. We described steps of the meta‐analytic process including question definition, data collection, data analysis, and reporting results. For each step, we explain the primary purpose, the tasks required of the meta‐analyst, and recommendations for best practice. Finally, we discuss recent developments in meta‐analytic techniques, which increase its effectiveness in business research.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/104066
Identification Number/DOI 10.1002/mar.21657
Divisions Henley Business School > Leadership, Organisations and Behaviour
Uncontrolled Keywords REVIEW ARTICLE, REVIEW ARTICLES, meta‐analysis, quantitative review, research synthesis, systematic literature review
Publisher Wiley
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar