Human rights accountability in domestic courts: does Kiobel increase the global governance gap?

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Bilchitz, D. orcid id iconORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6195-675X (2013) Human rights accountability in domestic courts: does Kiobel increase the global governance gap? Journal of South African Law, 2013 (4). pp. 794-805. ISSN 0257-7747

Abstract/Summary

The international community has, for over 40 years, been attempting to determine the legal obligations of corporations in relation to fundamental rights. The various initiatives that have been taken have all been seeking to address a recent reality: corporations no longer operate within one jurisdiction and have the capacity to cause serious harms in a range of jurisdictions. The special representative of the secretary general - Ruggie - was appointed in 2005 by the United Nations specifically to address the nexus of business and human rights in a globalised world. In laying out his three-pronged Framework proposal in 2008, he recognised that globalisation had caused a "governance gap" in the world.

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-clone.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/103051
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd (Juta's Law Journals)
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Search Google Scholar